Blog

Eliminating Opportunity Is Crucial to Fraud Deterrence

David Anderson is principal of David Anderson & Associates, a Philadelphia forensic accounting firm that provides a full range of fraud investigation, fraud deterrence programs and forensic accounting services in Philadelphia and the Delaware Valley.

Opportunity – the ability for fraudsters to carry out the misappropriation of cash or other company assets – is one of the three key elements necessary for fraud to occur, and it is an element that organizations often can eliminate by enacting strong anti-fraud controls as part of a comprehensive fraud deterrence program.

In its 2016 Report to the Nations, the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) found in almost 30 percent of identified fraud cases, the opportunity that allowed fraud to occur existed solely because the organization lacked the proper internal controls.  In almost another 20 percent of fraud cases, the opportunity for fraud existed because of a lack of management review.

“None of these frauds would have occurred if management had taken adequate preventive steps to eliminate the opportunity,” said Certified Fraud Examiner David Anderson of the Philadelphia forensic account services firm of David Anderson & Associates. “No matter how much pressure an employee is under to steal or how much they can rationalize their illicit actions; they cannot successfully carry out the fraud if the opportunity to do so doesn’t exist.”

Strong internal controls work to safeguard assets, ensure reliable financial reporting and make the organization compliant with laws and regulations, Anderson said.  Some of the more common internal controls include separation of duties (requiring more than one person be involved in processing and recording financial transactions); regular management review to provide oversight; and independent checks or audits, either with an internal audit department or external auditors to provide additional oversight, he said.

Reviewing monthly bank statements and monthly financial statements on a regular basis are critical factors of a strong management review process, Anderson added.

The ACFE report, which is derived from a global survey conducted biennially to study the costs, schemes, perpetrators and victims of fraud, also identified two other situations in which organizations can unintentionally foster opportunity for fraud, Anderson said.  These are:

  • Overriding of existing internal controls, which was responsible for 20 percent of fraud cases.  Fraud investigations indicate these situations occur when a more senior person, usually in management, persuades an employee to ignore or circumvent internal controls.  For example, a manager may ask an employee to print a check for a dollar amount that requires two levels of approval without proving the approvals were obtained.  Or an auto dealership employee may allow a customer to leave without paying for car repairs made by the dealership.
  • Poor tone at the top, a key factor in almost 10 percent of reported frauds.  Fraud investigations show employees take their cues from their supervisors.  If management engages in questionable behavior, such as overriding existing internal controls or running personal expenses through the company, it sends a message to the employee that such behavior is tolerated.

“It’s clear that companies can significantly reduce the chance of fraud occurring by eliminating the opportunity for it to occur,” said Anderson, a Certified Fraud Examiner and an ACFE member.  “It’s not a terribly difficult thing to do.  By enacting a fraud deterrence program with strong internal controls, you are taking a proactive approach to protecting your company.  You simply don’t let the fraudsters get away with it.”

Strong internal controls, regular management review and a strong anti-fraud message that is delivered by word and by action all are important components of comprehensive fraud deterrence programs created by an experienced firm that provides forensic accounting services in Philadelphia and the Delaware Valley, he added.

In the coming weeks, Anderson will continue to share findings from ACFE’s 2016 Report to the Nations, the results of a global survey conducted biennially to study the costs, schemes, perpetrators and victims of fraud.  The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners is the world’s largest anti-fraud organization, dedicated to fighting fraud through its more than 75,000 members in more than 150 countries worldwide.

If you require the services of a Certified Fraud Examiner or any other forensic accounting services in Philadelphia and the Delaware Valley, please contact the Philadelphia forensic accounting firm of David Anderson & Associates by calling David Anderson at 267-207-3597 or emailing him at david@davidandersonassociates.com.

About David Anderson & Associates

David Anderson & Associates is a Philadelphia forensic accounting firm that provides a full range of forensic accounting services in Philadelphia and the Delaware Valley.  The experienced professionals at David Anderson & Associates provide forensic accounting, business valuation, fraud investigation, litigation support, economic damage analysis, business consulting and outsourced CFO services.  Company principal David Anderson has more than 30 years of experience in financial and operational leadership positions and is a Certified Public Accountant, a Certified Fraud Examiner and a Certified Valuation Analyst.